	2m	70cm
Output	147.270	448.800
Input	147.870	443.800
CTCSS	100.0 Hz	88.5 Hz
Location	Justice Ctr	Lee Hill

Presentations

California Fire Radio Traffic

There are various scanner feeds for Los Angeles County available on Broadcastify at: https://www.broadcastify.com/lafire/

The first link (Consolidated Feed Dashboard) allows you to simultaneously listen to 6 feeds. You can pan them from left to right to make it a bit easier to differentiate them.

Note that these are actual firefighters, not ham communications.

Article on CW

Great Article about CW.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/morse-code-back-looking-ditch-twitter-180981309/?utm_source=pocket-newtab

Demonstrate SWR Reflected Power with a Water Tank

Ed – WA7EM

The educational topic on the Tuesday night net last week was SWR – standing wave ratio. I remembered a demonstration of wave motion done by my high school physics teach many years ago. I decided it would be fun to try to recreate that experiment.
The physics of wave motion is the same whether it is radio waves, sound waves, water waves, etc. So, what may be hard to understand in HF or VHF radio waves, may be more readily observed and understood with a water tank
Specifically, an old window is set level on some saw horses. It is filled with water (and a little food coloring). A battery drill is mounted in a support beside the window and a steel shaft is put in the chuck of the drill. A screw is run thru the shaft so that it touches the water with each revolution.
In the 1st video, the screw on the shaft acts as a point radiator. That would be like your ham radio with a simple non-directional antenna (like a vertical). In the water you see circular ripple patterns radiating equally outward in all directions. The perimeter of the window is so far away so that resistance has reduced the ripple to zero before it hits this window boundary. In radio, this is called an “isotropic radiator”. If this experiment could be done in 3D, the ripples would be equal in-plane and vertical.
In the 2nd video, the screw is augmented with a plate and the area of the ripple pattern is reduced with some wood blocks. This is meant to illustrate a radio signal going down a feedline to an antenna. The wood block at the far end illustrates a short circuit at the end of the feedline. If you look closely, you see the waves moving forward from the source combine with the waves bouncing off the “short” at the end
of the tank. The 2 combine to form a “standing wave”. In this imperfect experiment, the standing waves do not appear stationary, but moving slowing backward and forward. With a better tank and signal source, one could get tall perfectly stationary waves.
Now suppose part way down the path defined by the blocks of wood, I replaced the water with jello?
Since water and jello are signal mediums with different “impedance”, the wave would travel at a different speed in the jello vs the water. At the boundary of jello and water, you would see some of the energy transfer forward into the jello and some of it bounce back toward the source. That is what would happen if you connected a length of 52 ohm coax to a length of 72 ohm coax or your antenna is not well tuned.

LARCFest 2022 presentation – Observing Transceiver Signal Paths Using Tiny-SA Spectrum Analyzer

Part 2 of my postings on bringing my 1965 era Heathkit HW16 back on the air

Last month, I made general observations about my 1965 vacuum tube based Heathkit HW16 transceiver as compared to a modern transistor/microprocessor radio.

As we left the story, I said “things where generally working….”. Well, as I 10/3/21, I made my 1^st contact with this radio – about 20 miles on 80 meters between my home in Erie and Don, WB4FAS in Mead. Not only could Don hear me, but he said the signal was clean. Key “chirp” and “hum” is a common problem in old radios.

If you’re interested in how a non-expert slowly explores the inside of his radio, I did the following;

I observed that transmit power seemed to be low. I was taught that if a piece of equipment once worked, start at the output and move backward through the stages looking for the 1^st stage where things aren’t right. That’s a good method, but you don’t need to be overly rigid about it. You can wander around, looking at stuff that is easy to observe trying to find things that are obviously wrong. So, with my oscilloscope and digital multimeter, I checked
1. All the outputs of the power supply where correct. Voltage and ripple/other noise
2. That the CW keying dropped grid bias to the right level.
3. That there was an output signal on the antenna connector
4. That the cable to dummy load was good
5. That the cable from the vfo was good & there was a VFO signal, on the right frequency
6. With my Tiny-SA (Spectrum Analyzer), I observed transmit signal was on right frequency (and no obvious spurs or harmonics)
I cleaned the all the wafers of the band switch. They all showed some oxidation, but where in good repair.

When the dust settled, the following where the outcomes;

Cockpit errors and equipment problems
1. Bad BNC connector on cable from VFO. Needed to get a 93 ohm BNC cable.
2. Cold solder joint when I replaced RCA antenna connector with BNC
3. A Heathkit SWR bride came as part of the deal. It’s was somehow stuck, showing less than 5 watts. That is a mystery. Pumping 100 watts thru it using my main rig, cleared it.
4. There are several alignment steps. You use a special plastic hex head tool to adjust slugs in coils to peak the output on each of 3 bands. (BTW – there is still alignment on modern radios. It is done via the on-board computer with values stored in setup memory. In old radios, you move a ferrite up/down inside a big inductor).
5. New driver and power amplifier tubes where installed. Yes, you can still buy tubes and they are about $5 each. The old worked, but where about 20% low on output power.
6. I got an “eye roll” and “hand slap” by several on the internet about putting my scope probe on the plate of the power amplifier. When transmitting, there is a 700 volt sine wave on that pin. Most scopes have a maximum rating of 300-400 volts. Mine is higher rated and survived OK. All is well. I have learned a little about “RF Probes” to be used for such situations.

Things failed in the radio as received from prior owner
1. Really nothing. I anticipated resistors and capacitors that had radically changed value or totally failed. I feared failure of “unobtanium” part (coils, variable capacitors, power transformers, etc that you cannot obtain except by scavenging from another “donor” radio). But, none of that happened.
2. Big high voltage electrolytic “can” capacitors are notorious for failing with age. Standard practice is to buy the “recap” kit from https://hayseedhamfest.com/ and promptly install them. I have the kit and have done the installlation. That area of the radio is kinda crowded with voltage divider resistors.

A mysteries that remain is RF power output.

Today, radio spec sheets only talk about RF Power Out. “Back in the day”, they talked about “Power In”. Old FCC rules on CB radios specified 5 watts maximum “power in”. For a tube radio, “power in” is plate voltage times plate current. For a transistor radio, it was collector voltage times collector current.

After the power amplifier plate (or collector), comes the tank circuit. The tank circuit is a resonant LC network that filters out unwanted output frequencies and, for Class AB or C amplifiers, fills in the missing parts of the output sine wave (more on that another time). It also is an impedance transformer – bring the higher plate impedance down to the 50 ohms expected by the antenna. It seems that the HW16 has a lot of power loss in the tank circuit.

I am still trying to understand this and keep pestering others on the internet that seem to have knowledge on this. But, my HW16 is producing the 50 watts output that is commonly considered normal and correct. Many suggest the original Heathkit designer must have considered options on power and must have had good reasons to settle on 50 watts.

Usage experience
1. The 1^st thing one observes when attempting a QSO is you don’t have a digital frequency display, accurate down to the 10 Hz. Your mechanical dial says you are at a frequency, plus or minus about 5 Khz. An option on old radios was a “crystal calibrator” which would put out a tone every 100 Khz. You would turn it on and adjust your radio’s dial to line up with the 100Khz signal.
2. The 2^nd thing is that your signal drifts. Old rigs need to sit with power on for 30-60 minutes before everything has thermally settled down and stabilized.

The 3^rd chapter of this saga will be a walk through the receiver. It seems to work fine, but I am excited to observe with scope and meter how the rf amplifier feeds the intermediate frequency mixer which feeds the …… (you get the idea).

Scanners – a Lonely Ham’s Best Friend

I recently traveled out of my local (repeater) area to the Wasatch mountains in Utah, and had a positive experience using a handheld scanner to supplement playing ham radio.

About a year ago, I traveled to this area. Prior to traveling, I did what most responsible hams would do – I opened up CHIRP, did a proximity search on Repeater Book of my target area, and programmed in the local repeaters. When I got there, I heard nothing on the repeaters. Since I was in the mountains, deep in Little Cottonwood canyon most of the time, I expected this issue. I didn’t play ham radio when we weren’t at our hotel, so I didn’t know if I’d be able to hear or take part in banter when in Salt Lake City, where I regularly can at least connect to a WinLink machine from my Boulder, Colorado QTH.

So fast forward to this year. My Alinco and Baofeng HT’s search (as opposed to scan) really slow. Slow enough to miss activity. So I searched for a proper handheld scanner and found a deal on CraigsList that I couldn’t refuse – especially since I was able to stop by my local Denver Ham Radio Outlet on the way to see Craig.

A few definitions are in order:

scan: quickly go through programmed frequencies (i.e. known repeater outputs)
search: All frequencies in a given range/band (i.e. I don’t now who talks on what)

So I figured out that I really wanted to search, not scan, really. I read through the manual and learned how to use the search feature, and instructed my scanner to search through the 2m and 70cm ham bands. There’s also options to search other bands as well like:

Police
Fire/Emergency
Ham
Railroad
Civil Air
Military Air
CB
GMRS/MURS/FRS

There’s probably others. I have searched and listened to other interesting bands like Police, Fire, Railroad. Railroad was interesting, but Fire/Emergency is the most interesting – especially when there’s a natural disaster (forest fire) happening and all the coordination around it.

Police band isn’t interesting to me really, and listening to it makes you wonder what is wrong with people these days with all the crazy stuff that happens around here.

Ok so this time when we traveled to Snowbird, even though I set my HT’s to scan (programmed frequencies), I was able to use my handheld scanner to actually find a local repeater that I hadn’t programmed in! This repeater was pretty active while others weren’t active at all.

I looked up the repeater in Repeaterbook and wondered why CHIRP hadn’t included it in my proximity query. This is probably what the main problem was a year ago – the one active repeater I could hear in the canyon was not in the query result.

So I programmed in the repeater and when I had time (when my XYL was busy) I would listen for a Net so I could check-in at least. Interestingly, it was a 70cm repeater about 20 miles away. Maybe it had less multipath issues in the mountains? Who knows.

So I would say, if you don’t have a good (fast) scanning/searching HT, then buy yourself a cheap analog scanner to go along with it.

I’m looking for a HT that can search quickly like my scanner, because I don’t want to carry multiple HT’s if I can help it. I’m looking at a Yaesu VX6R but not sure if it can search/scan fast, unlike by Baofengs.

73,

AE0RS